The recent lull in the Middle East tensions after the execution of General Soleimani and the token Iranian reaction, needs to continue existing for stability in Iraq to be maintained

This is difficult in a country that is both decomposing and imploding. Iraq is the new geopolitical center of gravity in the Middle East.

Iraq is becoming an arena where various forces and interests collide.

20 attacks have taken place in Iraq since last October, targeting either the US embassy or the roughly 5,200 US troops stationed alongside local forces across Iraq.

Everyday 5-10 Iraqis die from terrorist acts.

The factors of instability are:

  • The Iranian Shia dominance that is not accepted, even by a significant number of Shia Iraqis.
  • The political class of the country that is both corrupt and subjugated to the Iranian theocracy.
  • Most of the people are below the poverty line in one of the richest in Oil and Gas deposits in the World.
  • The significant part of the secular Iraqi population is violently contesting any form of religious leadership.

The Iraqi territory is the major confrontation ground for the following forces:

  • ISIS that has doubled the number of soldiers it had when it began capturing territory in Iraq and Syria in 2014 and is poised for a comeback, as Masrour Barzani, prime minister of the autonomous region of Iraqi Kurdistan, confirmed.
  • Iran that has formed a number of Shia militias, initially to fight ISIS but subsequently to control Iraq.
  • Turkey is fighting the Kurds in Northern Iraq.
  • The US forces that are defending themselves from attacks from many, ideologically different, groups, that all agree on the “Yankees go home” slogan.
  • Russia is carefully creeping in to gain an ever-increasing share of Iraqi hydrocarbons wealth.

The local population is rioting every day with different ideological and material demands.
Criminal organizations use the blurred lines of violence, ideology, and anarchy to cover their unlawful activities.

Of all the above the reemergence of ISIS is extremely threatening to Iran.
confrontationIran has a core national interest in making sure there is not a fighting ISIS – led state on its border.

The reason that many States helped or tolerated the emergence of ISIS is that primarily ISIS are Sunni extremists that consider Shia Iran and Shiites everywhere their prime enemy and ISIS is a direct threat to Iran.

It is certain that Iran will fight against ISIS on Iraqi ground.
The most dangerous event for the very existence of Iraq as a State is the planned by the Iranians attack the US forces in Iraq using Iraqi paramilitary organizations whose actions cannot be directly attributed to Iran so that the risk of a direct violent confrontation between USA and Iran is minimized.

Although an attack on American forces by Iraqis is only a fig leaf, covering Iran who is the puppet master, the American response has to be contained within Iraq.

That serves well also the United States because a direct confrontation with Iran will be extremely costly in both lives and money.

While the low level covert diplomatic negotiations between the USA and Iran continue, this is not likely to happen.
However, as the sanctions continue and next year Iran will have Presidential Elections, the Iranian leadership must appear to do something against the “big Satan” as the ayatollahs call the United States.

Whether it will be the ISIS challenge or the Sanctions bite, Iran in both cases has to fight on Iraqi ground.

The dismemberment of Iraq that will necessarily follow will cause the greatest geopolitical upheaval in an area that has not had geopolitical peace for quite a long time.


Copyright © 2019 Kassandros. All rights reserved.
Reproduction permitted provided the author is mentioned.



  1. The dismemberment of Irak has been predicted for a long time. The geography does not link up with the geopolitics:
    1- Shias: oil if flowing from the South is Shia controlled (ie closely aligned with Iran) is not appealing to the West. Iraq being 2/3rd Shia would also mean Shias controlling the rump of any partitioned Iraq as well.
    2- Oil: northern oil fields straddle Kurdish and Sunni contentious areas and has no way of getting out.
    3- Syria: “Kurdistan” is majorly Syrian as well as Iraqi. Turkey will not allow Syrian partitioning unless it controls a substantial buffer zone in both countries, good luck to this being agreed in a friendly manner today..

    Iraq is likely to keep being a failed state à la Afghanistan rather than being legally partitioned unless and until Iran and the KSA make peace and/or Syria is dismembered, whenever these may happen…

    1. The comment is correct.
      Three points:
      1. Oil flows now from Iraqi Kurdistan to the International market through Turkey, with Turkey taking a very significant cut.
      2. Initially, Iraq will be only de facto divided, a bit more than now.
      De jure will follow later and it will be bloody.
      3. The clear and present danger is the new confrontation between ISIS and Iran on Iraqi soil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *